Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robyn's avatar

Thanks for this. It sounded so authoritative and scary, PRACTITIONER ONLY. I thought oh geez these must be dangerous. Nope, it's marketing. This should be regulated and pharmacies should not be allowed to advertise products this way.

Edit: The vital.ly blog was what made me look into it more. WTF is section 42AA? Oh the TGA regulates this? It's probably a requirement that these products be labeled as such. NOPE. That article is awful and a perfect example of what these products are designed to do - fool customers.

Expand full comment
Quiop's avatar

A frequent complaint about the US regulatory system is that manufacturers selling "medicines" need to demonstrate the efficacy of their products to the satisfaction of the FDA, while those selling "supplements" merely need to demonstrate their safety. (I believe the safety standards for supplements may also be somewhat different from those for medicines, but I'm not sure about the details.) Can you comment on how the Australian regulatory system handles this sort of distinction?

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts